HomeSearch for 'number'

number - Hottest news and rumors

Giants get excellent news on Evan Engram’s knee harm – NJ.com

Posted in Trending Topics on 24th September 2018

HOUSTON — The Giants acquired some excellent news Monday, in relation to tight finish Evan Engram’s knee harm that he suffered early in Sunday’s 27-22 win over the Houston Texans at NRG Stadium. 

In keeping with a report from ESPN’s Adam Schefter, Engram suffered a sprained MCL, and is taken into account week-to-week. 

Former NFL workforce doctor Dr. David Chao says Engram may miss “a number of” weeks (though it is famous that Chao didn’t look at Engram):

Engram was knocked from the sport early within the second quarter when Texans cornerback Kareem Jackson delivered a blow along with his helmet to Engram’s knee whereas making a sort out alongside the sideline. 

After the sport, Engram was seen strolling gingerly within the locker room and sporting a cumbersome brace of his proper knee. 

Previous to struggling the harm on Sunday, Engram caught one move for 19 yards. 

The information is clearly encouraging for each Engram and the Giants, forward of Sunday’s sport in opposition to the New Orleans Saints at MetLife Stadium. 

Studs and Duds from Giants’ win over Texans

Even when Engram is unable to play in Week four, the Giants will doubtless flip to Rhett Ellison and Scott Simonson to fill the void. Ellison caught three passes for 39 yards and a landing on Sunday in opposition to the Houston Texans. 

By way of the primary three weeks of the season, Engram has accounted for 10 catches for 104 yards and a landing, scored in Week 2 in opposition to the Dallas Cowboys. 

Along with Engram, the Giants hope to get exterior linebacker Olivier Vernon again on Sunday, after he seemingly made progress final week whereas nonetheless recovering from a high-ankle sprain suffered in observe again on Aug. 26. 

Matt Lombardo could also be reached at MLombardo@njadvancemedia.com. Comply with him on Twitter @MattLombardoNFL

McCain honored with phrases geared toward Trump – CNN

Posted in Trending Topics on 1st September 2018

For extra on the late senator’s legacy, tune in to “John McCain: For Whom the Bell Tolls” Saturday at 9 p.m. ET/PT.

Amid reward for the life and legacy of McCain have been frequent lamentations of Washington’s present political local weather. The person implicitly referenced in these criticisms, President Donald Trump, was requested to not attend on the late senator’s request and as an alternative visited one in every of his golf programs in Sterling, Virginia. He additionally tweeted on a number of events about unrelated subjects, together with commerce negotiations with Canada.

Among the many tributes — together with from former McCain rivals and Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama — was an emotional remembrance from McCain’s daughter Meghan that included a number of pointed and unmistakable references to Trump.

“We collect right here to mourn the passing of American greatness. The actual factor, not low cost rhetoric from males who won’t ever come close to the sacrifice he gave so willingly,” McCain stated in her remarks, throughout which she typically struggled to combat again tears.

“The America of John McCain has no must be made nice once more, as a result of America was at all times nice,” she stated at one level to sustained applause contained in the cathedral.

Drawing an additional distinction between her father and the present President, McCain stated, “We reside in an period the place we knock down outdated American heroes for all their imperfections when no chief needs to confess to fault or failure. You have been an exception and gave us a great to try for.”

Bush, Obama keep in mind formal rival

Bush remembered McCain in his remarks as “above all, a person with a code,” saying that “he lived by a set of public virtues that introduced power and objective to his life and to his nation.”

The previous President stated that the late senator “was brave” and “trustworthy, regardless of whom it offended,” including that even “presidents weren’t spared.”

“These in political energy weren’t exempt. At numerous factors all through his lengthy profession, John confronted insurance policies and practices that he believed have been unworthy of his nation. To the face of these in authority, John McCain would insist: We’re higher than this. America is best than this,” Bush stated.

Obama stated when McCain requested him to talk on the memorial service, he felt a mix of “unhappiness” and “a sure shock.” The request “captured a few of John’s important qualities,” together with his “capability to see previous variations seeking widespread floor,” Obama stated.

Bush remembers McCain: 'Rivalry melted away' with senator who 'made me better'

The previous President acknowledged the distinction between himself and McCain, saying, “We have been standard-bearers of various American political traditions.” However Obama spoke of a deep respect for the late senator. “For all our variations, for all of the instances we sparred, I by no means tried to cover, and I feel John got here to grasp, the longstanding admiration that I had for him.”

Obama additionally opened up about his behind-the-scenes relationship McCain and the bond they shared throughout get together traces.

“We did not promote it, however now and again over the course of my presidency, John would come over to the White Home and we’d simply sit and discuss within the Oval Workplace, simply the 2 of us,” Obama stated, saying they mentioned coverage, household and politics.

“Our disagreements did not go away throughout these personal conversations,” he stated. “However we loved the time we shared away from the brilliant lights.” Obama added, “When all was stated and executed, we have been on the identical crew.”

Show of unity

The remarks from former Democratic and Republican presidents who have been as soon as rivals to McCain despatched a message of unity and bipartisanship at a time when Washington is deeply divided.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger stated on the service that “the world will probably be lonelier with out John McCain,” however that, “even in his parting, John has bestowed on us a much-needed second of unity.”

Former Sen. Joe Lieberman, a Democrat-turned-Unbiased, recalled his friendship with McCain and spoke at size about how McCain had needed to call him as a working mate throughout his 2008 presidential marketing campaign.

Obama: McCain called on America to rise above 'mean and petty' politics

Lieberman recalled questioning whether or not it might work. “When he first talked to me about it, I stated, ‘You already know John, I am actually honored, however I do not see how you are able to do it,'” he stated, remembering a dialog he had with McCain.

He stated that the late senator responded with some impatience, saying: “That is the purpose Joe … You are a Democrat, I am a Republican, we might give our nation the bipartisan management it wants for a change.”

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who was McCain’s working mate within the 2008 presidential election was not invited to any of the memorial companies.

Notable attendees

Different Washington leaders and longtime associates of McCain attended the service.

Democratic former Vice President Joe Biden, who delivered an emotional eulogy for McCain at a memorial service in Arizona on Thursday, served as a pallbearer on Saturday.

Actor Warren Beatty, former New York Metropolis Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, former Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and former chief of employees to McCain Mark Salter additionally served as pallbearers, amongst others.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a detailed good friend of McCain’s, and McCain’s kids Jimmy and Sidney McCain all took half in readings in the course of the ceremony.

The President’s daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner each attended the ceremony. Trump’s private lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, tweeted later within the afternoon that he and his son attended the ceremony, which he described as a “stunning service.” Giuliani known as McCain “a beneficiant good friend in addition to a hero and patriot.”

Former Democratic President Invoice Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been additionally current.

In a poignant second, as McCain’s casket departed the cathedral, Roberta McCain, the late senator’s 106-year-old mom, sat alone in a wheelchair on the high of the steps, wanting down and wiping away tears. Finally, a uniformed navy officer joined her and introduced her again contained in the cathedral when the hearse left.

Week of memorials

The service adopted a public procession that introduced McCain’s physique from the US Capitol to the cathedral. The motorcade stopped alongside the way in which on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, the place Cindy McCain, the late senator’s spouse, laid a wreath in reminiscence of those that served within the Vietnam Struggle.

Cindy McCain tweeted on Saturday, “At the moment we misplaced our hero, our good friend, our mentor, our father, our grandfather and our husband. Collectively we mourn and collectively we go on.”

McCain, who died on the age of 81 final Saturday after a prolonged battle with mind most cancers, was an iconic determine in US politics. The Arizona Republican leaves behind a storied legacy of serving his nation in Congress and within the navy as a naval pilot.

The service at Washington Nationwide Cathedral is one in every of a number of occasions honoring McCain’s life this week.

On Thursday, a memorial service was held in Phoenix and on Friday, a ceremony was held within the US Capitol, the place McCain’s physique was lain in state. On Sunday, a personal service will happen on the US Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, after which his physique will probably be laid to relaxation within the US Naval Academy Cemetery.

CNN’s Liz Turrell, Ariana Figueroa, Veronica Stracqualursi, Sophie Tatum and Kyle Feldscher contributed to this report.

Elon Musk says he expects Saudis to fund plan to take Tesla non-public – CNNMoney

Posted in Trending Topics on 14th August 2018
Is Elon Musk taking Tesla private?

Is Elon Musk taking Tesla non-public?

Elon Musk, who tweeted final week that he had “funding secured” to take Tesla non-public, says he was referring to conversations he had with the Saudi sovereign wealth fund.

In a weblog publish early Monday, the Tesla CEO wrote that the Saudi fund had approached him “a number of instances” about taking the electrical automotive firm non-public.

Musk stated he left a July 31 assembly “with no query take care of the Saudi sovereign fund might be closed, and that it was only a matter of getting the method shifting.”

Sovereign wealth funds are funding funds managed by a nationwide authorities. The Saudis are attempting to diversify away from their curiosity in oil, and Musk stated Monday that they’d already taken a stake of just about 5% in Tesla.

A spokesperson for the Saudi fund declined touch upon Musk’s assertion. Tesla additionally declined additional remark.

Musk shocked and puzzled Wall Road on Tuesday with the tweet saying plans to take Tesla non-public at $ 420 per share. Analysts raised questions on the place that funding would come from.

Within the weblog publish, he elaborated on his plan.

Shopping for all Tesla’s shares on the $ 420 value would value nearly $ 72 billion. However Musk has stated he expects to carry on to his 20% stake within the firm. He has additionally stated he expects many different traders would retain their shares in a privately held Tesla.

On Monday, he estimated that about two-thirds of the shares held by present traders would stay in these arms, which would cut back the price of taking the corporate non-public to only beneath $ 24 billion.

That may nonetheless make it the fourth-most-expensive deal on document to take an organization non-public, in accordance with information from Dealogic.

tesla dealership red hook
A Tesla dealership in Purple Hook, Brooklyn, New York.

He additionally wrote that he expects many of the cash used to take the corporate non-public would come from traders shopping for fairness stakes. Usually, when an organization goes non-public, the corporate borrows cash to repurchase shares.

“I don’t suppose it could be clever to burden Tesla with considerably elevated debt,” Musk wrote.

The Saudis are in all probability not the one ones considering shopping for an fairness stake in Tesla, stated Adam Jonas, an auto analyst for Morgan Stanley. Expertise funds and different traders in search of a chunk of the subsequent era of autos, together with self-driving and electrical vehicles, may additionally have an interest.

“Elon Musk could also be the most effective positioned gamers on this ecosystem to discover the dimensions and availability of this pool of capital as anybody else out there,” Jonas wrote to purchasers on Monday.

However Tesla is dealing with such nice challenges, notably in ramping up its manufacturing, that it should make a decision quickly, he stated.

tesla showroom meatpacking district
Individuals have a look at new Tesla vehicles at a showroom in Manhattan’s Meatpacking district on June 6 in New York Metropolis.

“The longer this case with no extra particulars or path persists, we see affordable threat that the underlying enterprise might undergo some injury,” Jonas stated.

Later Monday, Musk tweeted that Goldman Sachs (GS) and funding agency Silver Lake will present monetary recommendation on the proposal to take Tesla non-public.

Goldman and Silver Lake weren’t out there for remark exterior of normal enterprise hours.

As a rising firm, Tesla wants a number of money. About $ 1.2 billion in debt comes due throughout the subsequent 12 months, and a deliberate manufacturing facility in China will value not less than $ 2 billion. Analysts have raised considerations a few attainable money crunch on the firm.

Musk stated he was making the assertion “to reply a number of the questions which have been requested since final Tuesday.” His tweets on the topic final week drew criticism, and even raised the potential of authorized issues.

As for why he made the shock public announcement final week, Musk wrote that he needed to be “utterly forthcoming.”

“It would not be proper to share details about going non-public with simply our largest traders with out sharing the identical info with all traders on the identical time,” he wrote within the weblog publish.

elon musk side chicago
Elon Musk, seen at a information convention in Chicago in June.

The Wall Road Journal reported Wednesday that regulators had been asking whether or not Musk’s tweet “was truthful.” And Bloomberg Information reported Thursday that regulators had been already gathering details about Tesla’s public statements about manufacturing objectives and gross sales targets, and intensified that scrutiny after the Musk tweet.

The SEC declined remark to CNNMoney.

Musk and Tesla additionally face two federal lawsuits accusing Musk of violating federal securities legislation by making false statements about funding for such a deal to be able to increase the corporate’s inventory value. Tesla declined touch upon the fits.

Tesla inventory rose nearly three% in early buying and selling, but it surely rapidly gave up these positive factors, and it was up solely barely in later buying and selling. The inventory was buying and selling at about $ 358, removed from the $ 420 proposed value for taking Tesla non-public.

That advised that many traders remained skeptical of the proposal. There are lots of obstacles to such a deal.

— CNN’s Emma Bowden and Clare Sebastian and CNNMoney’s Jackie Wattles and Jethro Mullen contributed to this report.

The largest threats towards the way forward for affirmative motion within the US – Quartz

Posted in Trending Topics on 4th July 2018

The Trump administration introduced Tuesday (July Three) that it’s going to encourage US faculty superintendents and faculty presidents to low cost race of their admissions choices, in response to the New York Instances and different media retailers, thereby reversing Obama-era affirmative motion pointers.

The Obama pointers, issued collectively by the Departments of Justice and Training in 2011 and 2016, laid out authorized suggestions for elementary and secondary faculties and faculty campuses on utilizing affirmative motion to “additional their compelling pursuits in reaching range and avoiding racial isolation,” primarily based on rulings by the Supreme Courtroom.

Now the Trump administration plans to argue that the joint Obama-era paperwork really transcend Supreme Courtroom precedent on the problem of affirmative motion. The transfer is is more likely to escalate the long-running nationwide debate over the position that race ought to play in faculty admissions, a problem the Supreme Courtroom has dominated on a number of occasions for the reason that 1970s.

Along with Trump’s announcement, affirmative motion faces a number of different challenges on the nationwide stage. Listed here are just a few developments to observe within the months forward:

The Harvard College lawsuit on behalf of Asian-American college students

The transfer by the Trump administration comes because the Justice Division is investigating whether or not Harvard College is illegally discriminating towards Asian-American college students in its admissions course of–a controversial transfer, on condition that the Obama administration had dismissed related instances.

The swimsuit, filed in 2014 by a bunch known as College students for Truthful Admissions, alleges that Harvard deliberately discriminates towards Asian-American candidates by holding them to greater requirements than non-Asian candidates, and by limiting the variety of Asian college students who’re admitted. It’s anticipated to go to trial in October, and can be anticipated to make its option to the Supreme Courtroom.

If it goes on to the Supreme Courtroom, a ruling in favor of College students for Truthful Admissions may upend affirmative motion insurance policies at faculties and universities throughout the nation. Many different Ivy League faculties, from Princeton to Cornell, even have excessive numbers of Asian-American candidates however comparatively decrease shared of Asian-Individuals college students.

Trump’s subsequent nominee for the US Supreme Courtroom

However what the Supreme Courtroom will do then is anyone’s guess. In 2016, the justices upheld affirmative motion in a Four-Three resolution (pdf) within the case of Abigail Fisher vs. the College of Texas at Austin. However in his opinion, justice Anthony Kennedy mentioned that universities should proceed to evaluation their affirmative-action insurance policies to evaluate their optimistic and unfavourable results, leaving the door open for future authorized challenges to the observe.

Now Kennedy has introduced his retirement. It’s a blow to affirmative motion supporters, since he was seen as the only decide among the many court docket’s present Republican appointees who was open to race-based affirmative-action plans for public faculties and universities. His Trump-nominated successor might take a distinct view of the observe.

It’s on this context that Trump administration officers have introduced a return to the race-blind admissions stance of the George W. Bush administration. The way forward for affirmative motion in faculty admissions issues not only for younger college students and their mother and father, however for all of American society—as the problem is a barometer of the prevailing US attitudes towards how a lot American establishments at massive owe minorities because of the nation’s legacy of slavery, racism and discrimination.

As Kennedy wrote in his majority opinion in Fisher vs. College of Texas at Austin, whereas “appreciable deference is owed to a college in defining these intangible traits, like pupil physique range, which are central to its identification and academic mission … it stays an everlasting problem to our Nation’s training system to reconcile the pursuit of range with the constitutional promise of equal therapy and dignity.”

Most Well-liked

It really is feasible to coach your mind to change into smarter

Federal appeals court docket hears CRISPR patent dispute – Science Journal

Posted in Trending Topics on 30th April 2018

A federal appeals court docket in the present day heard arguments that the U.S. patent workplace made authorized errors when reviewing its ruling on CRISPR, the genome editor.

iStockPhoto/no_limit_pictures

Right here’s a double-negative mind tornado with doubtlessly big monetary ramifications and a Nobel Prize resting on the reply: For an invention to be “nonobvious”—and due to this fact patentable in the USA—ought to there be no assure of success when researchers embark on experiments that result in the invention?

That mind-bending query was the centerpiece of a case heard in the present day by the U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., over the profitable patent portfolio surrounding the revolutionary genome editor generally generally known as CRISPR. This 2-year-old mental property battle pits legal professionals from the College of California (UC) towards litigators from the Broad Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Each groups signify teams of researchers from a number of establishments who declare to have made the important thing discoveries that enable CRISPR, which micro organism naturally use as an immune mechanism, to make exact cuts within the genomes of mammals—expertise that in the end might pave the way in which for brand spanking new medical remedies. The invention has spawned a number of corporations, and lots of count on it’s going to result in Nobel Prizes for the important thing scientists.

In April 2014, the Broad Institute obtained the primary of a number of issued patents for the mammalian cell use of CRISPR, which the UC legal professionals contested with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Workplace. However in February 2017, the Patent Trial and Enchantment Board (PTAB) dominated in favor of the Broad Institute. At a listening to in the present day that ran lower than 45 minutes, a lawyer for the UC system asserted that PTAB made a “authorized error” in its interpretation of “nonobvious” and requested the appeals court docket to both reverse the choice or—and that is the extra seemingly situation—remand the case again to PTAB to rethink its ruling. “UC did the most effective they might with the playing cards they have been dealt, but it surely’s nonetheless not trying nice for UC,” says Jacob Sherkow, a visiting scholar on the Stanford Legislation College in Palo Alto, California, who has adopted the case carefully and was on the listening to.

No authorized dispute surrounds the UC crew’s declare that it made the elemental invention of remodel CRISPR from a pure bacterial mechanism right into a lab genome enhancing software. That was first described on 28 June 2012, in a web based Science paper co-authored by Jennifer Doudna of UC Berkeley and Emmanuelle Charpentier, then with Umeå College in Sweden (now with the Max Planck Institute for An infection Biology in Berlin). The controversy facilities on who deserves credit score for shifting the system into mammalian cells, a feat first described by Broad’s Feng Zhang and colleagues on three January 2013 in one other on-line Science paper—a number of weeks earlier than the UC group and different investigators revealed related experiments. The UC researchers say it was apparent to check the system in mammalian cells, though there was no assure it will work. Because the college’s lead lawyer stated in a press launch issued shortly earlier than the listening to this morning, Broad and others used “standard, off-the-shelf instruments” to point out that CRISPR may minimize DNA in eukaryotic cells. UC argues that PTAB incorrectly hinged its pro-Broad choice on the truth that there was no assure the eukaryotic experiment would succeed, which might imply Broad met the nonobvious normal.

Sherkow says “there’s some dispute as to what PTAB actually ended up saying.” One decide on the three-judge panel in the present day appeared, he provides, “genuinely troubled by a number of the approach the PTAB described this nonobvious normal,” one was “very harsh towards the UC,” and the third requested solely technical questions that gave no trace of leanings. “If you will handicap [the appeals case], I nonetheless suppose it favors the Broad,” Sherkow says.

After the listening to, Broad issued a press release that stated, “We’re much more assured the Federal Circuit will affirm the PTAB’s judgment.”

Charles F. Robinson, UC common counsel and vice chairman of authorized affairs, additionally expressed confidence in a press release: “We introduced compelling arguments in the present day that the PTAB dedicated a number of authorized errors, together with disregarding Supreme Court docket and Federal Circuit precedent. Based mostly on the questioning in the present day, we’re optimistic that the court docket has severe doubts about a number of elements of the PTAB’s choice.”

The federal appeals court docket usually takes a number of months to concern a ruling.